Hi,

quick update: pekko-http got merged into the test suite (1), and a first
preliminary test round (2) shows it's on par with akka-http (as expected -
we didn't change the logic of the code itself). I'll post another update
when the final numbers are ready.

Oliver

(1)
https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/tree/master/frameworks/Scala/pekko-http
(2)
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=test&runid=074e8a70-d6fb-4f10-82f3-43e57c0965b5&test=json&l=zik0zj-35b&hw=ph&p=zik0z3-zik0zj-zik0zj-zik0zj-v2qiv3-1

Am Mi., 23. Aug. 2023 um 14:57 Uhr schrieb PJ Fanning <[email protected]>:

> I think we should be able to keep track of this in future.
>
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 13:20, Oliver Trosien <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi PJ,
> >
> > sure, I can do the initial submission. My main point is that it only
> makes
> > sense if the project is willing to take over the long-term maintainence.
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> >
> > Am Mi., 23. Aug. 2023 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb PJ Fanning <
> [email protected]
> > >:
> >
> > > Hi Olivier,
> > >
> > > Thanks for sharing your code. Are you planning on submitting that to
> > > TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks ?
> > >
> > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 07:13, Oliver Trosien <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > fair point. I have working code here (just the plain variant, not
> the one
> > > > with slick from Lightbend),
> > > > which is as you pointed out basically changing the imports plus
> doing a
> > > bit
> > > > of cleanup:
> > > > https://github.com/otrosien/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/1/
> > > >
> > > > Main difference to the akka version is that it runs on JDK17. Feel
> free
> > > to
> > > > use this as a baseline.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Oliver
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Am Di., 22. Aug. 2023 um 19:31 Uhr schrieb PJ Fanning <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Olivier. We have Pekko and Pekko HTTP releases that could be
> > > > > benchmarked. The Akka code could probably be pretty easily forked
> and
> > > > > used to create Pekko equivalents (mainly just changing the imports
> and
> > > > > possibly some config names).
> > > > >
> > > > > I wouldn't expect there to be much difference between the Akka and
> > > > > Pekko performance numbers.
> > > > >
> > > > > If someone has time to do the initial setup, it should be fairly
> > > > > straightforward for us to maintain it going forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > For my part, I'm more interested in getting all the Pekko modules
> > > > > released and helping to get widely used Akka ecosystem libs to
> support
> > > > > Pekko too (or to create Pekko based forks).
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 18:10, Oliver Trosien <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I wanted to ask the project team if they want to maintain an
> > > > > implementation
> > > > > > of the framework benchmark run for pekko (you can see the akka
> > > > > > implementation here: (1))
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would totally understand if you'd object this kind of
> > > "Benchmarketing",
> > > > > > but it still would give the project some additional visibility.
> I do
> > > > > have a
> > > > > > local version which basically is a copy of the akka one. While
> there
> > > are
> > > > > > some framework submissions driven by individuals, they usually
> don't
> > > have
> > > > > > insights or long-term interest in maintaining these submissions
> and
> > > as a
> > > > > > result performance regressions can shed bad light on the project
> (2).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > They want to close submissions to the next round soon (3) - and
> it
> > > > > usually
> > > > > > only happens once a year, so we would need to be quick to get
> > > included.
> > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >  Oliver
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (1)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/tree/master/frameworks/Scala/akka-http
> > > > > > (2)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/issues/7475#issuecomment-1607479108
> > > > > > (3)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/issues/7475#issuecomment-1684087157
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to