Hi,

Below my checks:

[X] Download links are valid.
[X] Checksums and signatures.
[X] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[X] No unexpected binary files
[X] All source files have ASF headers
[X ] Can compile from source
[ X ]Can verify the binary build


Here is my vote: +1

Thanks in advance.
Samuele

> On 31 Aug 2025, at 18:00, kerr <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Can we expect an 1.2.0 next week? thanks:)
> 
> 何品
> 
> 
> kerr <[email protected]> 于2025年8月27日周三 18:39写道:
> 
>> Thank you.
>> 何品
>> 
>> 
>> PJ Fanning <[email protected]> 于2025年8月27日周三 18:26写道:
>> 
>>> I'm not against doing a Pekko 1.1.6 release. We already have a milestone
>>> for that.
>>> We can backport bug fixes to Pekko 1.1.x branch and do a release for
>>> 1.1.6.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 at 11:24, kerr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> [image: image.png]
>>>> 
>>>> Because there is a bug in the harmless shutdown, you fixed that , and we
>>>> need this, and which is not being backport to pekko 1.1.x
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1555
>>>> 
>>>> 何品
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> PJ Fanning <[email protected]> 于2025年8月27日周三 18:17写道:
>>>> 
>>>>> I don't think the Pekko team should be making big refactors like this.
>>>>> Why don't you stick with Pekko 1.1 if you are not ready to upgrade
>>> Netty?
>>>>> All in all, this is better discussed on the GitHub issue.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 at 11:07, kerr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I encountered a problem at work,
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pekko/issues/2099
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A workmate is bumping their system from Akka to Pekko 1.2-M2, but the
>>>>> other
>>>>>> dependencies is still using Netty 4.1.2, so after the migration, she
>>>>> has to
>>>>>> exclude the Netty 4.2 dependencies.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Our RPC framework and many others still depend on Netty 4.1.x, I
>>> think
>>>>> we
>>>>>> should extract and provide both Netty 4.1 and Netty 4.2
>>> implementations
>>>>> for
>>>>>> classical transport in 1.2
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 何品
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> PJ Fanning <[email protected]> 于2025年8月27日周三 17:06写道:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [x] Download links are valid.
>>>>>>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>>>>>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files are ok
>>>>>>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>>>>>>> [x] All source files have ASF headers
>>>>>>> [x] Can compile from source
>>>>>>> [x] Can verify the binary build
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 at 16:18, kerr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I downloaded and ran the tests locally, it passed, also the last
>>>>> commit
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> there too.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [ x] Download links are valid.
>>>>>>>> [ x] Checksums and signatures.
>>>>>>>> [ x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>>>>>>> [x ] No unexpected binary files
>>>>>>>> [x ] All source files have ASF headers
>>>>>>>> [x ] Can compile from source
>>>>>>>> [ x] Can verify the binary build
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 何品
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> PJ Fanning <[email protected]> 于2025年8月25日周一 22:33写道:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hello Pekko Community,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko (Core)
>>>>> 1.2.0-RC1.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The discussion thread:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjl8jnr3no911188bf110mw7111m9sbt
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The release candidate:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pekko/1.2.0-RC1/
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> This release has been signed with a PGP key available here:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/pekko/KEYS
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Release Notes:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/pekko/blob/5b2ae61bf9e41f9dbda595c0ff903ea3ccafecb8/docs/src/main/paradox/release-notes/releases-1.2.md
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Git tag for the release:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pekko/tree/v1.2.0-RC1
>>>>>>>>> Git commit ID: eaf5bc9c9abc25b7b80c5aa8d86b46eb82205315
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I have also staged jars in the Apache Nexus Repository. These
>>> were
>>>>>>> built
>>>>>>>>> with the same code as appears in this Source Release Candidate.
>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate if users could test with these too.
>>>>>>>>> If anyone finds any serious problems with these jars, please
>>> also
>>>>>>> notify us
>>>>>>>>> on this thread.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/pekko/
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> For sbt 1.9.4 or greater you can add this resolver
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> resolvers += Resolver.ApacheMavenStagingRepo
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Otherwise for older versions of sbt
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> resolvers += "Apache Pekko Staging" at
>>>>>>>>> "https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging";
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The VOTE will pass if we have more positive votes than negative
>>>>> votes
>>>>>>>>> and there must be a minimum of 3 approvals from Pekko PMC
>>> members.
>>>>>>>>> Anyone voting in favour of the release, could you please
>>> provide a
>>>>>>> list of
>>>>>>>>> the checks you have done?
>>>>>>>>> The vote will be left open for at least 72hrs.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> To learn more about Apache Pekko, please see
>>>>> https://pekko.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Checklist for reference:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [ ] Download links are valid.
>>>>>>>>> [ ] Checksums and signatures.
>>>>>>>>> [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>>>>>>>> [ ] No unexpected binary files
>>>>>>>>> [ ] All source files have ASF headers
>>>>>>>>> [ ] Can compile from source
>>>>>>>>> [ ] Can verify the binary build
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> To compile from the source, please refer to:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/pekko?tab=readme-ov-file#building-from-source
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> To verify the binary build, please refer to:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/pekko-site/wiki/Pekko-Release-Process#verifying-the-binary-build
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Some notes about verifying downloads can be found at:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://pekko.apache.org/download.html#verifying-downloads
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> PJ Fanning (Apache Pekko PMC member)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 何品
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> PJ Fanning <[email protected]> 于2025年8月25日周一 22:33写道:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hello Pekko Community,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko (Core)
>>>>> 1.2.0-RC1.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The discussion thread:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjl8jnr3no911188bf110mw7111m9sbt
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The release candidate:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pekko/1.2.0-RC1/
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> This release has been signed with a PGP key available here:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/pekko/KEYS
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Release Notes:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/pekko/blob/5b2ae61bf9e41f9dbda595c0ff903ea3ccafecb8/docs/src/main/paradox/release-notes/releases-1.2.md
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Git tag for the release:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pekko/tree/v1.2.0-RC1
>>>>>>>>> Git commit ID: eaf5bc9c9abc25b7b80c5aa8d86b46eb82205315
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I have also staged jars in the Apache Nexus Repository. These
>>> were
>>>>>>> built
>>>>>>>>> with the same code as appears in this Source Release Candidate.
>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate if users could test with these too.
>>>>>>>>> If anyone finds any serious problems with these jars, please
>>> also
>>>>>>> notify us
>>>>>>>>> on this thread.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/pekko/
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> For sbt 1.9.4 or greater you can add this resolver
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> resolvers += Resolver.ApacheMavenStagingRepo
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Otherwise for older versions of sbt
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> resolvers += "Apache Pekko Staging" at
>>>>>>>>> "https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging";
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The VOTE will pass if we have more positive votes than negative
>>>>> votes
>>>>>>>>> and there must be a minimum of 3 approvals from Pekko PMC
>>> members.
>>>>>>>>> Anyone voting in favour of the release, could you please
>>> provide a
>>>>>>> list of
>>>>>>>>> the checks you have done?
>>>>>>>>> The vote will be left open for at least 72hrs.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> To learn more about Apache Pekko, please see
>>>>> https://pekko.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Checklist for reference:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [ ] Download links are valid.
>>>>>>>>> [ ] Checksums and signatures.
>>>>>>>>> [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>>>>>>>> [ ] No unexpected binary files
>>>>>>>>> [ ] All source files have ASF headers
>>>>>>>>> [ ] Can compile from source
>>>>>>>>> [ ] Can verify the binary build
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> To compile from the source, please refer to:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/pekko?tab=readme-ov-file#building-from-source
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> To verify the binary build, please refer to:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/pekko-site/wiki/Pekko-Release-Process#verifying-the-binary-build
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Some notes about verifying downloads can be found at:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://pekko.apache.org/download.html#verifying-downloads
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> PJ Fanning (Apache Pekko PMC member)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to