Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>since we use 'our' in the autogenerated .pm files, requiring 5.6.1 is
>>probably a good idea:
>>
>
> no need. .pm's that have a .xs are installed in $version/$arch
> so anybody using < 5.006 would have to try really hard to shoot themselves
> in the foot here. the top-level Makefile.PL does 'require 5.006', which
> should stay since it will compile/run with 5.006. if you want to add a
> suggestion to Makefile.PL that minimum 5.6.1 is suggested, that'd be fine.
is this OK? since we already require 5.006, v-strings aren't a problem.
Index: Makefile.PL
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/Makefile.PL,v
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -u -r1.58 Makefile.PL
--- Makefile.PL 31 Dec 2001 08:45:13 -0000 1.58
+++ Makefile.PL 6 Mar 2002 06:57:25 -0000
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@
}
}
+if ($^V lt v5.6.1) {
+ error "You are running Perl version " . sprintf("%vd", $^V),
+ "We strongly suggest to upgrade to at least 5.6.1";
+}
+
my $build = Apache::Build->new(init => 1);
my $code = ModPerl::Code->new;
--
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
