Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>that doesn't solve the problem for those expecting @INC to be >>un-modified behind the scenes. > > > one of us is missing something. > my most recent suggestion was to *change* any instance of '.' in @INC to > cwd, not to add anything. so lets say @INC was: > /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux > /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1 > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1 > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl > . > > the script name is /usr/local/apache2/perl-scripts/hello.pl, @INC becomes: > > /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux > /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1 > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1 > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl > /usr/local/apache2/perl-scripts
you are correct. the two are equivalent in respect to the 1.x registry behavior if chdir is NOP. __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
