On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
 
> none of these look like an intuitive replacement for a pool object as a 
> first argument :(

that's done on purpose.  if you're not going to pass in an APR::Pool 
object, you should know what you're doing.  that is, pretend we supported 
Apache::server_root_relative("logs");
much too easy for that to slip into code that is run at request time, 
making that code leak and unthread safe.

> Among other things, I've started porting apreq. If we get it into the 
> httpd-2.0 core before it gets released, can we use this lib's 
> functionality for parsing args as part of the modperl core? Do we have 
> any other alternatives other than the slow CGI.pm?

if the functions are in httpd-2.0 we will provide the direct mapping as 
Apache::Request does now.
$r->args parsing-in-an-array-context would still be deprecated.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to