Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Sun, 19 May 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>Is it ok if I drop ModPerl::RegistryNG? Currently it just an alias to >>ModPerl::Registry. there is no need for it, because the whole family is >>NG now. Also it's not called Apache::RegistryNG in any case. > > > sounds right to me. the original idea behind RegistryNG is that it would > replace Registry, so yes, 2.0 version is the 'NG' without having to say > 'NG'.
ok, done __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
