On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 09:08, Stas Bekman wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > > Once in a while we get mod_perl 1.0 patches posted from the kind folks. > > I'm trying to cope with 2.0 and I'm not very familiar with 1.0 guts, so > > I commit only things that I know about. Doug is too busy at work, so he > > is not here to do that. Therefore we need someone to take care of those > > infrequent patches. e.g. the recent one from John about the Sticky > > pnotes in registry. > > To clarify my original request: > > Doug will still handle the release management. What we need help with, is > maintaining the STATUS file and verifying and following up on submitted > patches so not to discourage contributions. (again talking mod_perl 1.0 here).
Isn't Geoffery taking care of this already ? Otherwise, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot... 1.0 patches are quite infrequent anyways. > __________________________________________________________________ > Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker > http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com > http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Philippe M. Chiasson /gozer\@(cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ 88C3A5A5 (122FF51B/C634E37B) http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3 A5A5 Q: It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious. perl -e'$$=\${gozer};{$_=unpack(P7,pack(L,$$));/^JAm_pH\n$/&&print||$$++&&redo}'
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
