On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 14:57, Stas Bekman wrote: > In 1.0 mod_perl extensions were passed -DMOD_PERL by Apache::src, so shouldn't > we pass -DMOD_PERL2 from ModPerl::MM and not -DMOD_PERL? > > At the same time we use <IfDefine MODPERL2> and not MOD_PERL2, so it gets all > confusing. Can we decide on consistently using the underscore or none in both > cases? I know that it's boring when the life is too easy... but > > My proposal: > > In order to stay consistent with 1.0 stuff, we go with the underscore, though > add '2', so we use -DMOD_PERL2 from ModPerl::MM, for extensions to use. > > Since <IfDefine MODPERL2> is new, we change it to <IfDefine MOD_PERL2> without > breaking anything. > > So it's always -DMOD_PERL2, be it httpd.conf or C code.
+1 for MOD_PERL2 consistently everywhere > __________________________________________________________________ > Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker > http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com > http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
