On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > At 01:06 AM 2/20/2003, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >Bill, is there a relation between a number of vhosts and a > >number of spawned threads for the startup times? Is it a > >correct observation from Randy, that you need to start at > >least N threads, where N is the number of vhosts? > > No. But it probably indicates a problem in the MPM - we should > not be timing out if things start up in any reasonable amount > of time. Even if you are throwing many requests at the server. > I'll play with trying to knock over the server with 10 threads > or so.
It didn't seem like there should be a relation; however, I thought it coincidental that ThreadsPerChild had to be set (apparently) to the number of vhosts in order to run the tests. For anything less, either a timeout in starting the server results, or it tries to start and then hangs, with an error message created in the logs suggesting to raise ThreadsPerChild, as the server ran out of threads to serve requests. But this just might be a coincidence, with other factors at play ... -- best regards, randy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
