Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> The question is whether this hit (e.g. magic retrieval) is wanted for > the general case. APR::Table is OK- how about using SvFAKE for the APR::Table return values instead? That way everybody wins- APR::Tables uses copy-on-write for the returned SV's (which is faster than doing newSVpv), and apreq can get the metadata back by interrogating those SV's (since they're not copies, so SvPVX(sv) still points to the original data[1]). -- Joe Schaefer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
