Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hmm, what about storing the pointer to apreq_value_t as val
AFAICT, that helps nada.
true, again because of newSVpv
in the table and subclass get() to do what you want?
Just subclassing get() might work! At the moment
I'm concerned about how each() is implemented; does
each make a call to FETCH to get at the value? If so, how does it handle multivalued keys?
From the perltie manpage:
FIRSTKEY and NEXTKEY implement the keys() and each() functions to iterate over all the keys.
looks like mpxs_APR__Table_NEXTKEY is correct, though we don't really have a test in t/response/TestAPR/table.pm for this.
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
