Geoffrey Young wrote:

we really ought to pin down exactly how far back we are going to support httpd/apr. since we're not 2.0 yet, we should probably just pick a version to support going forward. for instance, I'm not sure it makes sense to support 2.0.40 anymore - the back-compat stuff is starting to look ugly and I'd rather have clean code than support for httpd versions that are over a year old.

personally, I'd like to see 1.99_10 require a fairly new version, perhaps even as new as 2.0.47 - with 2.0.48 right around the corner, 2.0.47 is likely to be rather old itself by the time we release 2.0.

That sounds fine with me, but I'd suggest to consult Doug on that.


FWIW, Apache::Request 2 requires 2.0.46.

In any case when doing the syncing we should probably log the date when it was done, so in the future we can monitor the Changes file from that date onwards.

__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to