Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:

FYI...

I guess we need to consider how to handle 2.0 versus 2.2 stuff. things like auth providers bring with them new constants, header files, etc - stuff we will be expected to support going forward.


Frankly, I think we shouldn't spend a single moment on it at this point. For the same reason as we can't support 2.1 now.

well, I certainly wouldn't go that far. the moment the annoucement for 2.2 runs as


>> we'd recommend that 2.0 users migrate to 2.2 because it's
>> 'stable' and has more feature, blah, blah, blah.

apache 2.0 will quickly become less significant.

--Geoff


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to