On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Juanma Barranquero wrote:

> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:20:57 -0800, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I suppose Randy simply used the cvs version to make this build.

That's right ...

>
> Yeah, well, the problem is that now there's no 1.99_11 binary on
> Winnipeg :( :)

At one point I tried keeping multiple versions. This becomes
a bit complicated administratively, but more importantly,
99.9% of the time older versions have bugs that are fixed in
the current version. This is the main reason I use the cvs
version for the builds - however, I make sure that all, or
at least the vast majority, of tests pass with a given
build. So there's rarely a case of needing an older version,
especially for something like mod_perl 2 which is in
development.

-- 
best regards,
randy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to