>> Apache::LOG_MARK() is now Apache::Log::LOG_MARK() > > > So it shouldn't be called LOG_MARK, it's an ugly duplication: Log::LOG > > How about Apache::Log::MARK?
I thought about that, but we currently use Apache::Log::LOG_ERR, Apache::Log::LOG_DEBUG, etc for the constants, so I figured to keep the LOG_ prefix for LOG_MARK. of course, it's rather confusing that LOG_MARK is itself a function, so if we're going to take away the LOG_ prefix I'd rather call it Apache::Log::mark() so that it's clear it's a function. --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
