On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 13:45 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > Even though there is no ambiguety between mp1's shared lib: libperl.so and > mp2's mod_perl.so, i think we should use mod_perl2.so, since eventually we > will have mp3 and also it's possible that there will be mp2.2 incompatible > with mp2. Thoughts?
I think it's an excellent idea. +1 And we could possibly think of maintaining a sort of mod_perl.so -> mod_perl2.so symlink in the installation process (a-la ld.so) > __________________________________________________________________ > Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker > http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com > http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
