On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 02:49:56PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >I actually can't convince myself that changing APR_HAS_LARGE_FILES to be > >0 on APR HEAD when LFS support is *enabled* is the right thing to do; it > >just doesn't make sense. > > > >I think the right way to solve this is to make mod_perl's > >has_large_files_conflict/strip_lfs functions a bit more smarter, I'll > >follow up with a more concrete proposal tomorrow. > > I doubt this has anything to do with has_large_files_conflict. It's only > used to decide whether we can allow seek() with non-zero offset. The > segfaulting happens much much earlier.
The primary reason for has_large_files_conflict/strip_lfs existing is to prevent the problem now being seen on HEAD happening with 2.0. Remove the strip_lfs logic from mod_perl and try building against a 2.0.x release and I'll bet you'll see exactly the same issue. joe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
