Stas Bekman wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
and I now have two other tests (apr/util and modperl/exit) failing too (on their own, that is, not just after apr/pool).
What do you mean 'now', there weren't failing yesterday and started to fail now?
Yes -- they work in 1.99_14, but not using the CVS that I just grabbed
OK, let's figure it out. I've committed many new tests since the release.
Index: t/response/TestAPR/util.pm =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/t/response/TestAPR/util.pm,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 util.pm --- t/response/TestAPR/util.pm 22 May 2004 21:47:32 -0000 1.8 +++ t/response/TestAPR/util.pm 25 May 2004 08:16:52 -0000 @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ ok ! APR::Util::password_validate("one", "two");
my $clear = "pass1"; - my $hash = "1fWDc9QWYCWrQ"; + my $hash = crypt $clear, 'FE'; ok APR::Util::password_validate($clear, $hash);
Apache::OK;
Does this make any difference?
No, although the hardcoded hash is different to what crypt() returns in my Perl:
C:\Temp\modperl-2.0>perl -e "print crypt 'pass1', 'FE'" FExG070GemhK6
Can you take a look at apr_password_validate and see why it doesn't validate on windows?
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
