On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Steve Hay wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[ ... ]
Did you (or Markus?) see any problem with the modperl/pnotes test? Before I left I was getting a failure on one of the tests that tested if an entry exists - mine didn't. This was with an ActivePerl 810 compatible Win32 perl.
No, no problems:
t\modperl\pnotes....1..9 # Running under perl version 5.008005 for MSWin32 # Current time local: Thu Aug 19 18:08:29 2004 # Current time GMT: Thu Aug 19 17:08:29 2004 # Using Test.pm version 1.25 # Using Apache/Test.pm version 1.13 ok 1 # testing : $r->pnotes(key,val) # expected: pnotes_bar # received: pnotes_bar ok 2 # testing : $r->pnotes(key) # expected: pnotes_bar # received: pnotes_bar ok 3 # testing : ref($r->pnotes) # expected: HASH # received: HASH ok 4 # testing : $r->pnotes()->{} # expected: pnotes_bar # received: pnotes_bar ok 5 # testing : unset entry contents # expected: undef # received: undef ok 6 ok 7 # testing : deleted entry contents # expected: undef # received: undef ok 8 ok 9 ok All tests successful.
This is with my own builds of 2.0.50 / 5.8.5 (perl -V below) and CVS this morning (9am BST).
This sounds similar to what Geoff found, so it may be a thing that's a problem with earlier perls (pre-5.8.5?). If that's the case cross-platform, perhaps that one subtest (7) could be skipped for pre-5.8.5?
I can reproduce the problem with 5.8.0, so I'll take care of it. Thanks for pointing that out Geoff and Randy.
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
