> So Philippe you have a green light then :) And I suppose you can ping > Geoff for more real-world tests, once you adjust the existing tests.
:) > Of course one could argue that PerlModuleEarly is just as ambiguous, but > hey I was just suggesting a more intuitive name. I didn't suggest that > it was the best choice. :) > >> as I've brought up before, I think the entire notion of "starting >> early" is >> bogus - it's not "early" if I require perl code to run while >> httpd.conf is >> being parsed, it is exactly the right time. > > > Are you trying to say that we should stop deferring the perl startup as > you've suggested before? no, I think the current behavior of PerlModule is fine, as it works sufficiently well for most cases. if we have a way (other than hacking together a <Perl> section) to make sure that perl code can run at config time as well, then I'm all set. --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
