On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 10:27:23AM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 10:08:21AM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > >>And it'd be nice for the failing test to run t/REPORT and include it in > >>the output. W/o it we know almost nothing about what perl and apache > >>builds were used. > > > > > >I guessed you'd say that... I've changed the script to append ./t/REPORT > >and tail -100 t/logs/error_log if the tests fail. > > There is a better way, instead of 'make test' run t/SMOKE -bug and it'll > show the failing STDOUT and STDERR only for those tests that have failed > (it seeks through both streams after each test is run). It also scans for > core files (which makes it quite slower than plain t/TEST, but it tells > you exactly which test has caused the segfault). The only problem is that > it's not an equivalent of make test (yet). perhaps we should make a new > target for it. For now you need to run:
I don't have IPC::Run3 installed on many of my test machines (we don't ship it in the distro) so it's a bit of hassle to get t/SMOKE running unfortunately. joe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
