On Nov 22, 2004, at 6:37 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Really? I for one believe that the docs would be of better overall quality if they were maintained at the same time as the rest of the tree. On smaller-scale CPAN modules, I've found that insisting that contributors provide patches for all three of code, tests and docs results in a vastly more useable distribution.
They are maintained at the same time. but since we chose to have modperl-docs include modperl1, modperl2 and other general online docs, I call the whole unrelated (since only a chunk of it relates to each of the software projects).
This is why I suggest that they not be called "docs", since they're not documentation distributed for each release. They're really docs for the mod_perl site. Perhaps site-docs? Then it makes much more sense to maintain them separately from mod_perl1.x or mod_perl2.x.
Cheers,
David
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
