Stas Bekman wrote: >Steve Hay wrote: > > > >>Are we sure that the PerlInterpScope directive should not be at the >>top-level? If so, then reload.t is OK and we still have ithreads.t to fix. >> >> > >but it doesn't exist anymore. > I know. I wanted to double-check that that is correct. I'm only asking because putting it back makes the ithreads.t test pass...
------------------------------------------------ Radan Computational Ltd. The information contained in this message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems, please notify the sender immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Radan Computational Ltd. The recipient(s) of this message should check it and any attached files for viruses: Radan Computational will accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
