Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joe Schaefer wrote: >> Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>One more thought on this subject. We should probably create the >>>dependency only on custom pools, since doing so on things like >>>$r->pool is just a waste of CPU and memory, since the underlying C >>> object is not controlled by mp2 in this case. >> +1. Btw, Stas, IIRC 5.6.x's sv_magic allows multiple ext magic, >> so theoretically, #ifdef'ing your original 5.6.1 solution >> with 5.8.x's sv_magicext should work ok. > > Really? That's great. so what needs to be figured out is how to > resolve the other problems I've posted about in this thread. Mainly > it's about the usage of the currently existing magic. (All kind of > segfaults happen now)
Ordering them (I'd guess) so mg_find() never confuses the pool's placeholder magic with whatever real ext-magic it's expecting. But I suspect you've mucked around enough with this and didn't see anything improve. Sorry I can't offer more yet. Once I'm caught up, I'll definitely help out here. -- Joe Schaefer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
