Stas Bekman wrote: > As RC6 release didn't reveal any significant problems (a few minor bugs > that are either already fixed or will be shortly), I propose that it's > time to get 2.0.0 out. I was thinking to work next week to polish things > and improve docs and get 2.0.0 towards the end of the week/or the > beginning of the following week.
Sounds like a reasonable path to me. If necessary, I can take up the release-manager's hat once more if needed, since I have the time to. I would like to sort out the Apache::Reload segv problem before 2.0.0, though. > Besides being long overdue, my personal reason for getting it out now, > is that I'm finishing my contract with TM shortly and I'll be on the > road having vacation and teaching mp2 during most of the summer, so I > won't be able to deal with any post-release problems if it's released > later. Of course there are others who can do that, but it seems that > nobody has time nowadays. Still, we've been on the 2.0 path long enough IMO. There will still be problems and bugs, but we've always done a good job at hunting these down. > So please vote. Thanks. I am definitely +1 for a 2.0.0 release in the near future. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Philippe M. Chiasson m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ GPG KeyID : 88C3A5A5 http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3A5A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
