Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> I am not so surprised ;-) I've seen patches take many more iterations >> than this one before going thru. It's one way to keep the codebase >> clean and concise (and hopefully bug-free). > > Before I rip more of my hair out, I believe this whole thread is going > to be moot. *sigh*.
Well, depends on since when Perl started picking this up. My Perl-5.8.6 that comes with FC4 doesn't expose it in perl -V:ccflags, even though my gcc supports that option. A better patch might be to first check if we already have that option from Perl, otherwise, try and figure out if it's safe to add it ourselves. > Explanation: > > [...] > > I say the todo is done. > :) See above! > That'll teach me to jump into things :) Nah, It's still a vaild patch to finalize, IMO. > P.S. > Appologies for the BCC to the list and others last time, picked the > wrong header type somehow. np. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Philippe M. Chiasson m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ GPG KeyID : 88C3A5A5 http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3A5A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
