On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:29:49 -0800 Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > >> Probably ModPerl:: is the best fit, IMHO :) Though you may have > >> more popularity with /Apache/ in case people aren't aware about > >> the existance of the ModPerl:: namespace. > > > > Was I mistakenly under the impression that Modperl:: was reserved > > for modperl core ? > > Not at all. > > Apache2:: - apache2 stuff > APR:: - apr stuff > ModPerl:: - mod_perl stuff > > Most people keep using Apache by intertia (or because their module > existed before ModPerl:: was invented (tm)) Yeah I thought that Apache2:: and ModPerl:: might be reserved for core as well, but I'm glad I asked. Ok next question. It's safe to assume that the ModPerl:: space will be for MP2 and future versions right, since it didn't exist in MP1? What I have only works with MP2 and I don't want to put it in a space where people will assume it will work with both. --------------------------------- Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wiles.org --------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
