[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14205678#comment-14205678 ]
Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-971: ---------------------------------------- bq. Since each RS can act as a Phoenix client, we could implement a thin client that sends the query from the client to the RS which would most likely handle at least part of the query. I don't think that is a good idea. Today's server side parts of Phoenix already add heap, object allocation, and thread scheduling pressures to the RegionServer processes. The benefit of a query server as its own process is it can be separately provisioned sufficient resources to support parallel query dispatch and final results merging on behalf of a fleet of clients. Trying to do that inside the RS process instead is I fear a recipe for systemwide instability. > Query server > ------------ > > Key: PHOENIX-971 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-971 > Project: Phoenix > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Andrew Purtell > > Host the JDBC driver in a query server process that can be deployed as a > middle tier between lighter weight clients and Phoenix+HBase. This would > serve a similar optional role in Phoenix deployments as the > [HiveServer2|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Setting+Up+HiveServer2] > does in Hive deploys. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)