> if the latter, it's because we don't have one right now, which I think is a mistake in our pom structure.
As in, you think the client code needs to be separated from the server code so that you need less stuff on the client? Yes, totally.. but its not trivial to get there :) And has it really gained HBase that much? On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:27 PM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you meaning the client uberjar, like what we use from sqlline.py, or a > regular jar, as is done in the case of hbase-client? In the former case, we > don't do this because publishing uberjars on maven central is discouraged > (forbidden?). If the latter, it's because we don't have one right now, > which I think is a mistake in our pom structure. > > See also PHOENIX-1567. > > -n > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <mujt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > See this related thread > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-phoenix- > user/201409.mbox/%3CCAAF1JdiEMCFpt6epppJ+x_fDMd7RcX3f1sTbbbbHuPtd+hqjww@ > mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Devaraj Das <d...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > > > > > ?Hi, someone was asking me today why isn't there a phoenix-client (akin > > to > > > hbase-client) in the maven repo. I couldn't explain and thought of > asking > > > here... Am curious to know if there was any technical reasoning behind > > not > > > having that. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Devaraj > > > > > >
