+user Hi Jeff,
Phoenix and non-Phoenix tables can co-exist in the same cluster, no problem. Sharing the same table with both Phoenix and non-Phoenix clients can be a bit tricky. Likely you'll become intimately familiar Phoenix's encoding formats and compound-types. This interoperability is a road less traveled, but probably should be explored more thoroughly. Maybe some other folks on the user list can speak to their experiences with this. Thanks, Nick On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Jeffrey Lyons <jlyonsmwal...@yahoo.ca> wrote: > Hey all, > We previously had a setup with Phoenix views over an HBase table. However, > now we want to take advantage of Multi-tenancy so we are planning to map a > multi-tenant Phoenix table to the HBase table, and then put the views on > top of the Phoenix table. > The question that has been raised is if this will affect our ability to > write to the underlying HBase table? Currently we write to it using the > Java HBase client, ad we would like to keep it that way. Would this be a > problem if a phoenix table is put on top of it? > Thanks,Jeff
