[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14712522#comment-14712522
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2163:
---------------------------------------
Thanks, [~shuxi0ng]. Would you mind doing one more run, but this time just add
an EXPLAIN in front of each query? This will essentially only compile the query
- we'd like to see which succeed/fail and get an idea of the overhead of
Calcite compilation compared to Phoenix.
> Measure performance of Phoenix/Calcite querying
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-2163
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2163
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Assignee: Shuxiong Ye
> Attachments: PHOENIX-2163.patch, calcite-test-mac.tar.gz
>
>
> The work to integrate Phoenix with Calcite has come along far enough that
> queries both against the data table and through a secondary index is
> functional. As a checkpoint, we should compare performance of as many queries
> as possible in our regression suite for the calcite branch against the latest
> Phoenix release (4.5.0). The runtime of these two systems should be the same,
> so this will give us an idea of the overhead of query parsing and compilation
> for Calcite. This is super important, as it'll identify outstanding work
> that'll be necessary to do prior to any releases on top of this new stack.
> Source code of regression suite is at
> https://github.com/mujtabachohan/PhoenixRegressor
> Connection string location:
> https://github.com/mujtabachohan/PhoenixRegressor/blob/master/src/main/resources/settings.json
> Instructions on how to compile and run:
> https://github.com/mujtabachohan/PhoenixRegressor/blob/master/README.md
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
