Github user ankitsinghal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/153#discussion_r57598863
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/schema/MetaDataClient.java ---
@@ -544,7 +556,28 @@ private MetaDataMutationResult updateCache(PName
tenantId, String schemaName, St
return result;
}
-
+
+ public MetaDataMutationResult updateCache(String schemaName) throws
SQLException {
+ return updateCache(schemaName, false);
+ }
+
+ public MetaDataMutationResult updateCache(String schemaName, boolean
alwaysHitServer) throws SQLException {
+ long clientTimeStamp = getClientTimeStamp();
+ PSchema schema = null;
+ try {
+ schema = connection.getMetaDataCache().getSchema(new
PTableKey(null, schemaName));
--- End diff --
views with schema may not be needed to mapped to any namespace right as
view does not have any physical presence, so they can reside in different
schema referencing to any table(in any namespace/schema).
And, It seems tat other database like MySQL and Postgres also support views
across schemas like this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
