[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15227554#comment-15227554 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2628: ----------------------------------------- Github user chrajeshbabu commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/156#discussion_r58642188 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/iterate/TableResultIterator.java --- @@ -107,8 +127,37 @@ public synchronized void close() throws SQLException { @Override public synchronized Tuple next() throws SQLException { initScanner(); - Tuple t = scanIterator.next(); - return t; + try { + lastTuple = scanIterator.next(); + if (lastTuple != null) { + ImmutableBytesWritable ptr = new ImmutableBytesWritable(); + lastTuple.getKey(ptr); + } + } catch (SQLException e) { + try { + throw ServerUtil.parseServerException(e); + } catch(StaleRegionBoundaryCacheException e1) { + if(scan.getAttribute(NON_AGGREGATE_QUERY)!=null) { + Scan newScan = ScanUtil.newScan(scan); + if(lastTuple != null) { + lastTuple.getKey(ptr); + byte[] startRowSuffix = ByteUtil.copyKeyBytesIfNecessary(ptr); + if(ScanUtil.isLocalIndex(newScan)) { + newScan.setAttribute(SCAN_START_ROW_SUFFIX, ByteUtil.nextKey(startRowSuffix)); + } else { + newScan.setStartRow(ByteUtil.nextKey(startRowSuffix)); + } + } + plan.getContext().getConnection().getQueryServices().clearTableRegionCache(htable.getTableName()); + this.scanIterator = + plan.iterator(DefaultParallelScanGrouper.getInstance(), newScan); --- End diff -- Agree with you James. I think I can raise another issue for this and work on it. Wdyt? > Ensure split when iterating through results handled correctly > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: PHOENIX-2628 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2628 > Project: Phoenix > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: James Taylor > Assignee: Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla > Fix For: 4.8.0 > > Attachments: PHOENIX-2628-wip.patch, PHOENIX-2628.patch, > PHOENIX-2628_v7.patch, PHOENIX-2628_v8.patch > > > We should start with a test case to ensure this works correctly, both for > scans and aggregates. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)