[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15228345#comment-15228345
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-1311:
-----------------------------------------
Github user ankitsinghal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/153#discussion_r58715199
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/FromCompiler.java ---
@@ -265,12 +332,18 @@ public SingleTableColumnResolver(PhoenixConnection
connection, NamedTableNode ta
if (def.getColumnDefName().getFamilyName() != null) {
families.add(new
PColumnFamilyImpl(PNameFactory.newName(def.getColumnDefName().getFamilyName()),Collections.<PColumn>emptyList()));
}
- }
- Long scn = connection.getSCN();
- PTable theTable = new PTableImpl(connection.getTenantId(),
table.getName().getSchemaName(), table.getName().getTableName(), scn == null ?
HConstants.LATEST_TIMESTAMP : scn, families);
+ }
+ Long scn = connection.getSCN();
+ String schema = table.getName().getSchemaName();
+ if (connection.getSchema() != null) {
--- End diff --
Actually, when the schema for the table{T} is not present, we try to
resolve table with connection schema {<connection_schema>.T} if set in
connection.
I have added a test case UseSchemaIT#testMappedView, is it you are
expecting?
> HBase namespaces surfaced in phoenix
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-1311
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1311
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: nicolas maillard
> Assignee: Ankit Singhal
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.8.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-1311.docx, PHOENIX-1311_v1.patch,
> PHOENIX-1311_v2.patch, PHOENIX-1311_wip.patch, PHOENIX-1311_wip_2.patch
>
>
> Hbase (HBASE-8015) has the concept of namespaces in the form of
> myNamespace:MyTable it would be great if Phoenix leveraged this feature to
> give a database like feature on top of the table.
> Maybe to stay close to Hbase it could also be a create DB:Table...
> or DB.Table which is a more standard annotation?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
