[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15306347#comment-15306347
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-2915:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12806924/PHOENIX-2915_v1.patch
  against master branch at commit 95c004112bae47624f4764154e90cc36a54827f1.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12806924

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated 
31 warning messages.

    {color:red}-1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch generated 4 release 
audit warnings (more than the master's current 0 warnings).

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines 
longer than 100:
    +    public MetaDataMutationResult dropTable(final List<Mutation> 
tableMetaData, final PTableType tableType,
+     * PHOENIX-2915 while dropping index, flush data table to avoid stale WAL 
edits of indexes 1. Flush parent table if
+            PTable parentTable = getTable(null, 
table.getParentName().getString(), HConstants.LATEST_TIMESTAMP);
+    private PTable getTable(PName tenantId, String fullTableName, long 
timestamp) throws SQLException {
+            if (table.getTimeStamp() >= timestamp) { // Table in cache is 
newer than client timestamp which shouldn't be
+            MetaDataMutationResult result = this.getTable(null, schemaName, 
tableName, HConstants.LATEST_TIMESTAMP,

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/374//testReport/
Release audit warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/374//artifact/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditWarnings.txt
Javadoc warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/374//artifact/patchprocess/patchJavadocWarnings.txt
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/374//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Dropping of Index can still leave some non-replayed writes in WAL
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-2915
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2915
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ankit Singhal
>            Assignee: Ankit Singhal
>             Fix For: 4.8.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-2915.patch, PHOENIX-2915_v1.patch
>
>
> It could be possible , that there are some index writes in WAL which are not 
> replayed and the index is dropped.
> And, now the table is not there, these writes cannot be replayed which result 
> in data table regions also to not come up.
> {code}
> 2016-05-16 07:30:29,215 ERROR [RS_OPEN_REGION-R2-DN8-188:16020-72] 
> handler.OpenRegionHandler: Failed open of region=<regioname>, starting to 
> roll back the global memstore size.
> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.exception.MultiIndexWriteFailureException: 
> Failed to write to multiple index tables
>         at 
> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.recovery.TrackingParallelWriterIndexCommitter.write(TrackingParallelWriterIndexCommitter.java:235)
>         at 
> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.IndexWriter.write(IndexWriter.java:193)
>         at 
> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.IndexWriter.write(IndexWriter.java:172)
>         at 
> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.Indexer.preWALRestore(Indexer.java:564)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost$58.call(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1432)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost$RegionOperation.call(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1673)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.execOperation(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1748)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.execOperation(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1705)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.preWALRestore(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1423)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.replayRecoveredEdits(HRegion.java:4029)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.replayRecoveredEditsIfAny(HRegion.java:3885)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.initializeRegionStores(HRegion.java:949)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.initializeRegionInternals(HRegion.java:819)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.initialize(HRegion.java:794)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:6243)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:6204)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:6175)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:6131)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:6082)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.handler.OpenRegionHandler.openRegion(OpenRegionHandler.java:362)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.handler.OpenRegionHandler.process(OpenRegionHandler.java:129)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.executor.EventHandler.run(EventHandler.java:128)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> 2016-05-16 07:30:29,216 INFO  [RS_OPEN_REGION-R2-DN8-188:16020-72] 
> coordination.ZkOpenRegionCoordination: Opening of region {ENCODED => 
> cd82f0b9f06972b6b111c368076677be, NAME => <regionname>', STARTKEY => 'x', 
> ENDKEY => 'y'} failed, transitioning from OPENING to FAILED_OPEN in ZK, 
> expecting version 28
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to