[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16064183#comment-16064183
 ] 

Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-3964:
----------------------------------------

Thanks [~comnetwork] for the explanation. you are right it uses a 
PhoenixIndexFailurePolicy on retry and disables the index if it couldn't 
succeed again.
And if it needs to kill the server (when it unable to disable the index) then 
WAL's will stay as an operation like flush and writes will not work until 
postOpen is complete(I have tested this too). +1 to commit this.

> Index.preWALRestore should handle index write failure
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-3964
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3964
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.10.0
>            Reporter: chenglei
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-3964_v1.patch
>
>
> When I restarted my hbase cluster a certain time, I noticed some regions are 
> in FAILED_OPEN state and the RegionServers have some error logs as following:
> {code:java}
> 2017-06-20 12:31:30,493 ERROR [RS_OPEN_REGION-rsync:60020-3] 
> handler.OpenRegionHandler: Failed open of 
> region=BIZARCH_NS_PRODUCT.BIZTRACER_SPAN,0100134e-7ddf-4d13-ab77-6f0d683e5fad_0,1487594358223.57a7be72f9beaeb4285529ac6236f4e5.,
>  starting to roll back the global memstore size.
> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.exception.MultiIndexWriteFailureException: 
> Failed to write to multiple index tables
>         at 
> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.recovery.TrackingParallelWriterIndexCommitter.write(TrackingParallelWriterIndexCommitter.java:221)
>         at 
> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.IndexWriter.write(IndexWriter.java:185)
>         at 
> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.RecoveryIndexWriter.write(RecoveryIndexWriter.java:75)
>         at 
> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.Indexer.preWALRestore(Indexer.java:554)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost$58.call(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1312)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost$RegionOperation.call(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1517)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.execOperation(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1592)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.execOperation(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1549)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.preWALRestore(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1308)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.replayRecoveredEdits(HRegion.java:3338)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.replayRecoveredEditsIfAny(HRegion.java:3220)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.initializeRegionStores(HRegion.java:823)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.initializeRegionInternals(HRegion.java:716)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.initialize(HRegion.java:687)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:4596)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:4566)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:4538)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:4494)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:4445)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.handler.OpenRegionHandler.openRegion(OpenRegionHandler.java:465)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.handler.OpenRegionHandler.process(OpenRegionHandler.java:139)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.executor.EventHandler.run(EventHandler.java:128)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> When I look the code of Index.preWALRestore method, I find 
> RecoveryIndexWriter.write method is used to write the indexUpdates in 
> following line 543: 
>    
> {code:java}
>  
> 526  public void preWALRestore(ObserverContext<RegionCoprocessorEnvironment> 
> env, HRegionInfo info,
> 527      HLogKey logKey, WALEdit logEdit) throws IOException {
> 528      if (this.disabled) {
> 529          super.preWALRestore(env, info, logKey, logEdit);
> 530          return;
> 531        }
> 532    // TODO check the regions in transition. If the server on which the 
> region lives is this one,
> 533    // then we should rety that write later in postOpen.
> 534    // we might be able to get even smarter here and pre-split the edits 
> that are server-local
> 535    // into their own recovered.edits file. This then lets us do a 
> straightforward recovery of each
> 536    // region (and more efficiently as we aren't writing quite as 
> hectically from this one place).
> 537
> 538    /*
> 539     * Basically, we let the index regions recover for a little while long 
> before retrying in the
> 540     * hopes they come up before the primary table finishes.
> 541     */
> 542    Collection<Pair<Mutation, byte[]>> indexUpdates = 
> extractIndexUpdate(logEdit);
> 543    recoveryWriter.write(indexUpdates, true);
> 544  }
> {code}
> but the RecoveryIndexWriter.write method is as following, it directly throws 
> Exception except non-existing tables, so RecoveryIndexWriter's 
> failurePolicy(which is StoreFailuresInCachePolicy by default) even has no 
> opportunity to be used,  and it leads to Index.failedIndexEdits which is 
> filled by the StoreFailuresInCachePolicy is always empty.
> {code:java}
>  public void write(Collection<Pair<Mutation, byte[]>> toWrite, boolean 
> allowLocalUpdates) throws IOException {
>         try {
>             write(resolveTableReferences(toWrite), allowLocalUpdates);
>         } catch (MultiIndexWriteFailureException e) {
>             for (HTableInterfaceReference table : e.getFailedTables()) {
>                 if (!admin.tableExists(table.getTableName())) {
>                     LOG.warn("Failure due to non existing table: " + 
> table.getTableName());
>                     nonExistingTablesList.add(table);
>                 } else {
>                     throw e;
>                 }
>             }
>         }
>     }
> {code}
> So the Index.postOpen method seems useless, because the updates Multimap in 
> following 500 line which is got from Index.failedIndexEdits is always empty.
> {code:java}
> 499  public void postOpen(final ObserverContext<RegionCoprocessorEnvironment> 
> c) {
> 500     Multimap<HTableInterfaceReference, Mutation> updates = 
> failedIndexEdits.getEdits(c.getEnvironment().getRegion());
> 501     
> 502     if (this.disabled) {
> 503         super.postOpen(c);
> 504         return;
> 505      }
> 506   
> 507     //if we have no pending edits to complete, then we are done
> 508     if (updates == null || updates.size() == 0) {
> 509       return;
> 510      }
> 511
> 512     LOG.info("Found some outstanding index updates that didn't succeed 
> during"
> 513            + " WAL replay - attempting to replay now.");
> 514    
> 515     // do the usual writer stuff, killing the server again, if we can't 
> manage to make the index
> 516     // writes succeed again
> 517     try {
> 518        writer.writeAndKillYourselfOnFailure(updates, true);
> 519     } catch (IOException e) {
> 520              LOG.error("During WAL replay of outstanding index updates, "
> 521                    + "Exception is thrown instead of killing server 
> during index writing", e);
> 522    }
> 523  }
> {code}
> So  I think in Index.preWALRestore method,  we should use 
> RecoveryWriter.writeAndKillYourselfOnFailure method to write the indexUpdates 
> and handle index write failure, not just use the RecoveryIndexWriter.write 
> method.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to