[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sergey Soldatov reopened PHOENIX-3360:
--------------------------------------

Well, I don't like to do that, but this fix doesn't work. Checked with master 
branch with HBase 1.3.
I believe that most of the testing was performed with the initial patch which 
sets configuration for the services and the case with setting configuration for 
the env was not tested or was tested with Phoenix controller factory in 
hbase-site.xml. 
When we are getting connection for the environment, we call 
CoprocessorHConnection#getConnectionForEnvironment which has following code:
{code}
   if (env instanceof RegionCoprocessorEnvironment) {
      RegionCoprocessorEnvironment e = (RegionCoprocessorEnvironment) env;
      RegionServerServices services = e.getRegionServerServices();
      if (services instanceof HRegionServer) {
       * return new CoprocessorHConnection((HRegionServer) services);*
      }
    }
{code}
Since we are running on RS, we get the connection with _services_ 
configuration. 

> Secondary index configuration is wrong
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-3360
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3360
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: William Yang
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 4.10.0
>
>         Attachments: ConfCP.java, indexlogging.patch, PHOENIX-3360.patch, 
> PHOENIX-3360-v2.PATCH, PHOENIX-3360-v3.PATCH, PHOENIX-3360-v4.PATCH
>
>
> IndexRpcScheduler allocates some handler threads and uses a higher priority 
> for RPCs. The corresponding IndexRpcController is not used by default as it 
> is, but used through ServerRpcControllerFactory that we configure from Ambari 
> by default which sets the priority of the outgoing RPCs to either metadata 
> priority, or the index priority.
> However, after reading code of IndexRpcController / ServerRpcController it 
> seems that the IndexRPCController DOES NOT look at whether the outgoing RPC 
> is for an Index table or not. It just sets ALL rpc priorities to be the index 
> priority. The intention seems to be the case that ONLY on servers, we 
> configure ServerRpcControllerFactory, and with clients we NEVER configure 
> ServerRpcControllerFactory, but instead use ClientRpcControllerFactory. We 
> configure ServerRpcControllerFactory from Ambari, which in affect makes it so 
> that ALL rpcs from Phoenix are only handled by the index handlers by default. 
> It means all deadlock cases are still there. 
> The documentation in https://phoenix.apache.org/secondary_indexing.html is 
> also wrong in this sense. It does not talk about server side / client side. 
> Plus this way of configuring different values is not how HBase configuration 
> is deployed. We cannot have the configuration show the 
> ServerRpcControllerFactory even only for server nodes, because the clients 
> running on those nodes will also see the wrong values. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to