[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16085137#comment-16085137
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-3994:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12876987/PHOENIX-3994_v4.patch
  against master branch at commit 06c10dc391220da8e54f0191bef1c9b8b702f651.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12876987

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated 
51 warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines 
longer than 100:
    +            
Mockito.verify(TestPhoenixIndexRpcSchedulerFactory.getIndexRpcExecutor(), 
never()).dispatch(Mockito.any(CallRunner.class));
+                // Disable running upsert select on server side if a table has 
global mutable secondary indexes on it
+                boolean hasGlobalMutableIndexes = 
SchemaUtil.hasGlobalIndex(table) && !table.isImmutableRows();
+                runOnServer = (sameTable || (serverUpsertSelectEnabled && 
!hasGlobalMutableIndexes)) && isAutoCommit && !table.isTransactional()
+    public DelegateRegionCoprocessorEnvironment(Configuration config, 
RegionCoprocessorEnvironment delegate) {
+            targetHTable = new HTable(upsertSelectConfig, 
projectedTable.getPhysicalName().getBytes());
+        DelegateRegionCoprocessorEnvironment indexWriterEnv = new 
DelegateRegionCoprocessorEnvironment(clonedConfig, env);
+                LOG.error("Exception caught while trying to close the 
HConnection used by CoprocessorHConnectionTableFactory");
+                                    LOG.debug("indexRegion.batchMutate failed 
and fall back to HTable.batch(). Got error="

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

     {color:red}-1 core zombie tests{color}.  There are 1 zombie test(s):       
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.rsgroup.TestShellRSGroups.testRunShellTests(TestShellRSGroups.java:97)

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/1205//testReport/
Javadoc warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/1205//artifact/patchprocess/patchJavadocWarnings.txt
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/1205//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Index RPC priority still depends on the controller factory property in 
> hbase-site.xml
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-3994
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3994
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.11.0
>            Reporter: Sergey Soldatov
>            Assignee: Samarth Jain
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 4.12.0, 4.11.1
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-3994_addendum.patch, PHOENIX-3994.patch, 
> PHOENIX-3994_v2.patch, PHOENIX-3994_v3.patch, PHOENIX-3994_v4.patch
>
>
> During PHOENIX-3360 we tried to remove dependency on 
> hbase.rpc.controllerfactory.class property in hbase-site.xml since it cause 
> problems on the client side (if client is using server side configuration, 
> all client request may go using index priority). Committed solution is using 
> setting the controller factory programmatically for coprocessor environment 
> in Indexer class, but it comes that this solution doesn't work because the 
> environment configuration is not used for the coprocessor connection 
> creation. We need to provide a better solution since this issue may cause 
> accidental locks and failures that hard to identify and avoid. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to