[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16171811#comment-16171811
 ] 

Kang Yuan commented on PHOENIX-4021:
------------------------------------

we backport this patch to phoenix4.11-HBase-0.98 .The performance go down a lot 
when CachineHTableFactory is disabled, so many HTables were been created and 
used once.It's wast and lower the performance 
can we make CachingHTableFactory thread safe instead of removing it

> Remove CachingHTableFactory
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-4021
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4021
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.11.0
>            Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>            Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>              Labels: globalMutableSecondaryIndex
>             Fix For: 4.12.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-4021.patch
>
>
> CachingHTableFactory is used as a performance optimization when writing to 
> global indexes so that HTable instances are cached and later automatically 
> cleaned up, rather than instantiated each time we write to an index.
> This should be removed for two reasons:
> 1. It opens us up to race conditions, because HTables aren't threadsafe, but 
> CachingHTableFactory doesn't guard against two threads both grabbing the same 
> HTable and using it simultaneously. Since all ops going through a region 
> share the same IndexWriter and ParallelWriterIndexCommitter, and hence the 
> same CachingHTableFactory, that means separate operations can both be holding 
> the same HTable. 
> 2. According to discussion on PHOENIX-3159, and offline discussions I've had 
> with [~apurtell], HBase 1.x and above make creating throwaway HTable 
> instances cheap so the caching is no longer needed.
> For 4.x-HBase-1.x and master, we should remove CachingHTableFactory, and for 
> 4.x-HBase-0.98, we should either get rid of it (if it's not too much of a 
> perf hit) or at least make it threadsafe.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to