[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16175353#comment-16175353
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-4220:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12888330/PHOENIX-4220_v2.patch
  against master branch at commit 3fb104ee56518ca066672e199bff1ed4f4bd9a7e.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12888330

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines 
longer than 100:
    +        
serverProps.put(QueryServices.INDEX_FAILURE_HANDLING_REBUILD_INTERVAL_ATTRIB, 
Long.toString(REBUILD_INTERVAL));
+            conn.createStatement().execute("CREATE TABLE " + fullTableName + 
"(k VARCHAR PRIMARY KEY, v1 VARCHAR, v2 VARCHAR) COLUMN_ENCODED_BYTES = 0, 
STORE_NULLS=true");
+            conn.createStatement().execute("CREATE INDEX " + indexName + " ON 
" + fullTableName + " (v1, v2)");
+            HTableInterface metaTable = 
conn.unwrap(PhoenixConnection.class).getQueryServices().getTable(PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.SYSTEM_CATALOG_NAME_BYTES);
+            conn.createStatement().execute("UPSERT INTO " + fullTableName + " 
VALUES('a','a', '0')");
+            // Set clock forward in time past the "overlap" amount we wait for 
index maintenance to kick in
+            conn.createStatement().execute("UPSERT INTO " + fullTableName + " 
VALUES('bb','bb','11')");
+    private static void waitForIndexRebuild(Connection conn, String 
fullIndexName, PIndexState expectedIndexState, MyClock clock, long increment) 
throws InterruptedException, SQLException {
+                                    
getTimestampForBatch(scanBeginTime,batchExecutedPerTableMap.get(dataPTable.getName())));
+                                                       MutationPlan plan = 
compiler.compile(Collections.singletonList(tableRef), null, null, null, 
scanEndTime);

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/1469//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/1469//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Upper bound not being used in partial index rebuilder
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-4220
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4220
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: James Taylor
>             Fix For: 4.12.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-4220.patch, PHOENIX-4220_v2.patch
>
>
> Though we're setting the scan upper and lower bound, it's not taking effect 
> in the index rebuilder. Thus, we're rebuilding from the lower bound to the 
> latest timestamp which is bad if the table is taking a lot of writes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to