[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16222697#comment-16222697
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-4323:
----------------------------------------

We can make this less likely by appending a 0 after the region start key, 
before appending all the rest.
I.e. now we do something like regionkey|rest, we could do regionkey|0|rest. It 
would still be possible to have this scenario, just much less likely.

We could also have a split policy for this and or make sure that is in this 
case the regionEndKey and at least regionStartKey | 255.
In these cases, though, we run the risk of very large regions.


> LocalIndexes could fail if your data row is not in the same region as your 
> index region
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-4323
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4323
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: churro morales
>            Assignee: Vincent Poon
>         Attachments: LocalIndexIT.java
>
>
> This is not likely to happen, but if this does your data table and index 
> write will never succeed. 
> In HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation() 
> You create index rows in the preBatchMutate() then when you call checkRow() 
> on that index row the exception will bubble up if the index row is not in the 
> same region as your data row.  
> Like I said this is unlikely, but you would have to do a region merge to fix 
> this issue if encountered.  
> [~vincentpoon] has a test which he will attach to this JIRA showing an 
> example how this can happen. The write will never succeed unless you merge 
> regions if this ever happens. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to