[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16356377#comment-16356377
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4278:
-----------------------------------------
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/291#discussion_r166816466
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/execute/PhoenixTxnIndexMutationGenerator.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,505 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.phoenix.execute;
+
+import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
+import com.google.common.collect.Maps;
+import com.google.common.collect.Sets;
+import com.google.common.primitives.Longs;
+import org.apache.commons.logging.Log;
+import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.*;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.*;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.RegionCoprocessorEnvironment;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.ImmutableBytesWritable;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.MiniBatchOperationInProgress;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Bytes;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Pair;
+import org.apache.phoenix.compile.ScanRanges;
+import org.apache.phoenix.coprocessor.BaseScannerRegionObserver;
+import org.apache.phoenix.filter.SkipScanFilter;
+import org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.MultiMutation;
+import org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.ValueGetter;
+import org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.covered.IndexMetaData;
+import org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.covered.IndexUpdate;
+import org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.covered.TableState;
+import org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.covered.update.ColumnReference;
+import org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.covered.update.ColumnTracker;
+import org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.covered.update.IndexedColumnGroup;
+import org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.util.ImmutableBytesPtr;
+import org.apache.phoenix.index.IndexMaintainer;
+import org.apache.phoenix.index.PhoenixIndexCodec;
+import org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixConnection;
+import org.apache.phoenix.query.KeyRange;
+import org.apache.phoenix.schema.PTable;
+import org.apache.phoenix.schema.types.PVarbinary;
+import org.apache.phoenix.transaction.PhoenixTransactionContext;
+import
org.apache.phoenix.transaction.PhoenixTransactionContext.PhoenixVisibilityLevel;
+import org.apache.phoenix.util.ScanUtil;
+import org.apache.phoenix.util.SchemaUtil;
+
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.sql.SQLException;
+import java.util.*;
+
+
+public class PhoenixTxnIndexMutationGenerator {
--- End diff --
I reviewed this, but it's difficult to determine if anything has changed. I
see that you've removed coprocessor specific stuff like
RegionCoprocessorEnvironment and the serialized PhoenixIndexMetaData which you
don't need any more. Also, attributes aren't pass through TxTableState, but it
seems like we don't rely on this anywhere that I can see. Any other changes
that you remember that you think I should look at?
> Implement pure client side transactional index maintenance
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4278
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4278
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Assignee: Ohad Shacham
> Priority: Major
>
> The index maintenance for transactions follows the same model as non
> transactional tables - coprocessor based on data table updates that looks up
> previous row value to perform maintenance. This is necessary for non
> transactional tables to ensure the rows are locked so that a consistent view
> may be obtained. However, for transactional tables, the time stamp oracle
> ensures uniqueness of time stamps (via transaction IDs) and the filtering
> handles a scan seeing the "true" last committed value for a row. Thus,
> there's no hard dependency to perform this on the server side.
> Moving the index maintenance to the client side would prevent any RS->RS RPC
> calls (which have proved to be troublesome for HBase). It would require
> returning more data to the client (i.e. the prior row value), but this seems
> like a reasonable tradeoff.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
