[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16436520#comment-16436520
]
Ethan Wang commented on PHOENIX-4605:
-------------------------------------
I tried to check the patch on master. I got error for two tables to be deleted.
(caused by if we remove the file then no need to remove the content of the
file?)
error: patch failed:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/transaction/OmidTransactionTable.java:1
error:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/transaction/OmidTransactionTable.java:
patch does not apply
error: patch failed:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/transaction/TephraTransactionTable.java:1
error:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/transaction/TephraTransactionTable.java:
patch does not apply
> Support running multiple transaction providers
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4605
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Assignee: James Taylor
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-4605_v1.patch, PHOENIX-4605_v2.patch,
> PHOENIX-4605_v3.patch, PHOENIX-4605_wip1.patch, PHOENIX-4605_wip2.patch,
> PHOENIX_4605_wip3.patch
>
>
> We should deprecate QueryServices.DEFAULT_TABLE_ISTRANSACTIONAL_ATTRIB and
> instead have a QueryServices.DEFAULT_TRANSACTION_PROVIDER now that we'll have
> two transaction providers: Tephra and Omid. Along the same lines, we should
> add a TRANSACTION_PROVIDER column to SYSTEM.CATALOG and stop using the
> IS_TRANSACTIONAL table property. For backwards compatibility, we can assume
> the provider is Tephra if the existing properties are set to true.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
