[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16436520#comment-16436520 ]
Ethan Wang commented on PHOENIX-4605: ------------------------------------- I tried to check the patch on master. I got error for two tables to be deleted. (caused by if we remove the file then no need to remove the content of the file?) error: patch failed: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/transaction/OmidTransactionTable.java:1 error: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/transaction/OmidTransactionTable.java: patch does not apply error: patch failed: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/transaction/TephraTransactionTable.java:1 error: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/transaction/TephraTransactionTable.java: patch does not apply > Support running multiple transaction providers > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: PHOENIX-4605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605 > Project: Phoenix > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: James Taylor > Assignee: James Taylor > Priority: Major > Attachments: PHOENIX-4605_v1.patch, PHOENIX-4605_v2.patch, > PHOENIX-4605_v3.patch, PHOENIX-4605_wip1.patch, PHOENIX-4605_wip2.patch, > PHOENIX_4605_wip3.patch > > > We should deprecate QueryServices.DEFAULT_TABLE_ISTRANSACTIONAL_ATTRIB and > instead have a QueryServices.DEFAULT_TRANSACTION_PROVIDER now that we'll have > two transaction providers: Tephra and Omid. Along the same lines, we should > add a TRANSACTION_PROVIDER column to SYSTEM.CATALOG and stop using the > IS_TRANSACTIONAL table property. For backwards compatibility, we can assume > the provider is Tephra if the existing properties are set to true. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)