[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16540416#comment-16540416
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3534:
-----------------------------------------
Github user twdsilva commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/303#discussion_r201776089
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/coprocessor/MetaDataEndpointImpl.java
---
@@ -1457,28 +1791,110 @@ private static void getSchemaTableNames(Mutation
row, byte[][] schemaTableNames)
schemaTableNames[2] = tName;
}
}
-
+
@Override
public void createTable(RpcController controller, CreateTableRequest
request,
RpcCallback<MetaDataResponse> done) {
MetaDataResponse.Builder builder = MetaDataResponse.newBuilder();
byte[][] rowKeyMetaData = new byte[3][];
byte[] schemaName = null;
byte[] tableName = null;
+ String fullTableName = null;
try {
int clientVersion = request.getClientVersion();
List<Mutation> tableMetadata =
ProtobufUtil.getMutations(request);
MetaDataUtil.getTenantIdAndSchemaAndTableName(tableMetadata,
rowKeyMetaData);
byte[] tenantIdBytes =
rowKeyMetaData[PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.TENANT_ID_INDEX];
schemaName =
rowKeyMetaData[PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.SCHEMA_NAME_INDEX];
tableName =
rowKeyMetaData[PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.TABLE_NAME_INDEX];
+ fullTableName = SchemaUtil.getTableName(schemaName, tableName);
+ // TODO before creating a table we need to see if the table
was previously created and then dropped
+ // and clean up any parent->child links or child views
--- End diff --
Done.
> Support multi region SYSTEM.CATALOG table
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-3534
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Assignee: Thomas D'Silva
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 5.0.0, 4.15.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-3534.patch
>
>
> Currently Phoenix requires that the SYSTEM.CATALOG table is single region
> based on the server-side row locks being held for operations that impact a
> table and all of it's views. For example, adding/removing a column from a
> base table pushes this change to all views.
> As an alternative to making the SYSTEM.CATALOG transactional (PHOENIX-2431),
> when a new table is created we can do a lazy cleanup of any rows that may be
> left over from a failed DDL call (kudos to [~lhofhansl] for coming up with
> this idea). To implement this efficiently, we'd need to also do PHOENIX-2051
> so that we can efficiently find derived views.
> The implementation would rely on an optimistic concurrency model based on
> checking our sequence numbers for each table/view before/after updating. Each
> table/view row would be individually locked for their change (metadata for a
> view or table cannot span regions due to our split policy), with the sequence
> number being incremented under lock and then returned to the client.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
