[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva reassigned PHOENIX-5295:
---------------------------------------
Assignee: Hieu Nguyen (was: Hieu Nguyen)
> Local Index data not replicating for older HBase versions (<= HBase 1.2)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5295
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5295
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Environment: Branch 4.14-cdh5.11
> Reporter: Hieu Nguyen
> Assignee: Hieu Nguyen
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5295.4.14-cdh5.11.v1.patch,
> PHOENIX-5295.4.14-cdh5.11.v1.patch, PHOENIX-5295.4.14-cdh5.11.v2.patch,
> PHOENIX-5295.4.14-cdh5.11.v3.patch
>
> Time Spent: 1h 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Copied from email thread
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7ab1d9489eca2ab2b974948fbe60b143fda432ef7dfc603528d460f2@%3Cuser.phoenix.apache.org%3E.
> ---
> We are on Phoenix 4.14-cdh5.11. We are experiencing an issue where local
> index data is not being replicated through HBase replication. As suggested
> in a previous email thread
> (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/984fba3c8abd944846deefb3ea285195e0436b9181b9779feac39b59@%3Cuser.phoenix.apache.org%3E),
> we have enabled replication for the local indexes (the "L#0" column family
> on the same table). We wrote an integration test to demonstrate this issue
> on top of 4.14-cdh5.11 branch
> (https://github.com/hnguyen08/phoenix/commit/3589cb45d941c6909fb3deb5f5abb0f8dfa78dd7).
> After some investigation and debugging, we discovered the following:
> 1. Commit a2f4d7eebec621b58204a9eb78d552f18dcbcf24 (PHOENIX-3827) fixed the
> issue, but only in Phoenix for HBase1.3+. It uses the
> miniBatchOp.addOperationsFromCP() API introduced in HBase1.3. Unfortunately,
> for the time being, we are stuck on cdh5.11 (based on HBase1.2).
> 2. IndexUtil.writeLocalUpdates() is called in both implementations of
> IndexCommitter, both taking skipWAL=true. It seems like we'd actually want
> to not skip WAL to ensure that local-index updates are replicated correctly
> (since, as mentioned in the above email thread, "HBase-level replication of
> the data table will not trigger index updates"). After changing the skipWAL
> flag to false, the above integration test passes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
