Oops, forgot to add the footnote above: [1]
https://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_chapter/tar_8.html#SEC146

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:23 PM Geoffrey Jacoby <[email protected]> wrote:

> Looking at this some more, I created Docker containers for CentOS and
> Ubuntu and verified that I could use the GNU version of tar they included
> to successfully untar the tarball in the RC. (There were some extraneous
> warnings -- apparently BSD tar uses a few headers that GNU tar doesn't
> understand -- but they didn't affect the output.)
>
> The GNU docs specify that the POSIX extensions to the tar format is
> supported in 1.14 or later[1], and recent CentOS and Ubuntu releases have
> included tar versions far later than that, such as 1.26 in CentOS.
>
> So far RC2 still seems OK to me, but very curious to know what the
> environment is where it's failing. Once we know that we can judge how
> serious it is. Worst case, we can do an RC3 using GNU tar to make the
> tarballs.
>
> Geoffrey
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:45 AM Geoffrey Jacoby <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Cheng is a PMC member and has a binding vote. Just as a reminder, the
>> Apache policy for releases is at least 3 +1s and more positive votes than
>> negative; releases can't be vetoed the way patches can.[1] That said, we've
>> always taken -1s very seriously, and I agree that if the tarball is corrupt
>> that would be a reason for sinking the RC.
>>
>> Like Swaroopa, I can't reproduce the problem. I've untarred the source on
>> several different machines over the past week or so and not seen the
>> PaxHeaders that Cheng is seeing. It may be relevant that all the machines
>> I've done this on have been Macs, which use the BSD tar.
>>
>> Some searching shows that PaxHeaders are apparently a POSIX extension to
>> the tarball standard [2] and that a tar utility that doesn't understand the
>> extension may manifest the extra headers as extra files.
>>
>> Cheng, could you please share what version of tar or other decompression
>> tool you're using to help us figure this out?
>>
>> Geoffrey
>> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
>> [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34688392/paxheaders-in-tarball
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:00 AM swaroopa kadam <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you all who voted.
>>>
>>> [email protected] - I downloaded and untarred the tar files on Linux,
>>> macOS, and windows. I didn't see the "PaxHeader" in any environment.
>>> Is your -1 binding or non-binding?
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:48 AM [email protected] <[email protected]
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > -1,
>>> > I am very strange to find that there is a "PaxHeader" directory in
>>> every
>>> > subdirectory in the
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/apache-phoenix-4.14.3-HBase-1.3-rc2/src/apache-phoenix-4.14.3-HBase-1.3-src.tar.gz
>>> > and
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/apache-phoenix-4.14.3-HBase-1.4-rc2/src/apache-phoenix-4.14.3-HBase-1.4-src.tar.gz
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > At 2019-08-15 01:24:16, "swaroopa kadam" <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >Hello Everyone,
>>> > >
>>> > >This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.14.3 RC2. This is a
>>> patch
>>> > >release of Phoenix 4.14 and is compatible with Apache HBase 1.3 and
>>> > >1.4. The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience
>>> > >binary
>>> > >release for each supported HBase version.
>>> > >
>>> > >This release includes critical bug fixes and improvements for
>>> secondary
>>> > >indexes -- making them self-consistent.
>>> > >
>>> > >The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found
>>> at:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/apache-phoenix-4.14.3-HBase-1.3-rc2/src/
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/apache-phoenix-4.14.3-HBase-1.4-rc2/src/
>>> > >
>>> > >The binary artifacts can be found at:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/apache-phoenix-4.14.3-HBase-1.3-rc2/bin/
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/apache-phoenix-4.14.3-HBase-1.4-rc2/bin/
>>> > >
>>> > >For a complete list of changes, see:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315120&version=12345601
>>> > >
>>> > >Artifacts are signed with my "CODE SIGNING KEY": 48B7807D95F127B5
>>> > >
>>> > >KEYS file available here:
>>> > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS
>>> > >
>>> > >The tag to be voted upon:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix.git;a=commit;h=e2993552dc88cb7fc59fc0dfdaa2876ac260886c
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix.git;a=commit;h=eb5424573bd2f5f247a61d1a28da81fb92f06ec6
>>> > >
>>> > >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote:
>>> > >
>>> > >[ ] +1 approve
>>> > >[ ] +0 no opinion
>>> > >[ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason why)
>>> > >
>>> > >Thanks,
>>> > >The Apache Phoenix Team
>>> > >
>>> > >--
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >Swaroopa Kadam
>>> > >[image: https://]about.me/swaroopa_kadam
>>> > ><
>>> >
>>> https://about.me/swaroopa_kadam?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Swaroopa Kadam
>>> [image: https://]about.me/swaroopa_kadam
>>> <
>>> https://about.me/swaroopa_kadam?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api
>>> >
>>>
>>

Reply via email to