[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Xinyi Yan updated PHOENIX-6174:
-------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 4.17.0
                   4.16.1

> Phoenix Metrics Initial Unification
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-6174
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6174
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 5.1.0, 4.x
>            Reporter: Daniel Wong
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.16.1, 4.17.0
>
>
> I see this as an incremental improvement toward a larger more powerful 
> metrics framework in phoenix-server, phoenix-client, and phoenix-connectors.  
> Today we describe our available metrics as 
> https://phoenix.apache.org/metrics.html
> Long term a tag based multi-dimensional data model (similar to 
> prometheus/open tsdb) may be superior but for now this targets simple 
> generalization of the existing metrics in phoenix.  Today much of the metrics 
> are built on hbase/hadoop offering.
>  
> Some initial discussion/brainstorming:
> Metric Types:
>   Phoenix uses/provides sufficient verbosity of metrics, but does not define 
> the metric types cleanly.  Typical counter, gauge, histogram
>  
> Monitoring Models:
>   Events (Event Metrics), metrics with no summarization or aggregation.  
>      Example of this will be request metrics.  On this request you used 5 
> scanners.
>   Metrics (Summary/Aggregated Metrics), 
>     Example of this might be total queries
> Reporting:
>   Today JMX is one of the main approaches used in phoenix for metrics.  For 
> events most of them are retrievable from PhoenixRuntime.  Long term these 
> should be pluggable.
>  
> Storage:
>   End user based on reporting is envisioned.
>   May consider storing in HBase/Phoenix as an option?  The query log could 
> store events with that query log entry.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to