Hi!

Thanks for calling this out, Geoffrey.
This was an oversight, I ignored that some of the +1s were non-binding.
I'll keep this in mind for next time.

regards
Istvan

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 11:23 PM Geoffrey Jacoby <gjac...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for everyone's hard work at getting phoenix-thirdparty done and
> tested so quickly.
>
> However, I'm a bit confused -- I see the public announcement for
> phoenix-thirdparty-1.1.0's release went out when the vote was by my
> count +2 binding (Istvan and Ankit), +2 non-binding (Xinyi and Viraj), and
> no 0s or -1s. By Apache rules doesn't a release need at least 3 binding
> (from PMC members) +1s and more positives than negatives? [1] If so,
> Chinmay's binding +1 a few minutes later fixes the problem, so _now_ we
> have enough to release at +3 binding, +2 non-binding.
>
> Was there a third binding +1 that I missed by announce time, was this an
> oversight, or have I misunderstood the rules?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Geoffrey
>
> [1]
>
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#:~:text=For%20a%20release%20vote%20to,by%20PMC%20members%20are%20binding
> .
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 3:57 PM Chinmay Kulkarni <
> chinmayskulka...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (Belated)
> >
> > Build: OK
> > Build Phoenix master branch with latest thirdparty: OK
> > Build Phoenix 4.x branch with PR
> > <https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1123> and latest thirdparty: OK
> > Release Notes: OK
> > Staging Repo and tests: OK
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 10:42 PM Ankit Singhal <ankitsingha...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >  * Build phoenix-thirdparty - OK
> > >  * Build Phoenix master with phoenix-thirdparty - Ok
> > >  * apache-rat:check check failed for following files (it's better we
> > remove
> > > them):-
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> phoenix-thirdparty/phoenix-shaded-commons-cli/src/main/patches/CLI-254-1.4.patch
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> phoenix-thirdparty/phoenix-shaded-commons-cli/src/main/java/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> > >  *  Distribution link for the vote has a typo, the correct link seems
> to
> > be
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/phoenix-thirdparty-1.1.0RC0/
> > >  * RELEASE notes and changes.md seems to be not updated from the last
> > > release.
> > >  * Signature and checksum - Ok
> > >  * Licence and Notice(nit: Copyright 2021) - Ok
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ankit Singhal
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:05 PM Viraj Jasani <vjas...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Build: ok
> > > > Compilation against master and 4.x branch: ok
> > > > ChangeLog/Release notes: ok
> > > >
> > > > Staging repository looks good:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/phoenix/thirdparty/phoenix-thirdparty/1.1.0/
> > > >
> > > > IT results look good on PRs #1122 and #1123.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/01/29 21:32:39, Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Please vote on this Apache phoenix thirdparty release candidate,
> > > > > phoenix-thirdparty-1.1.0RC0
> > > > >
> > > > > The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache phoenix thirdparty 1.1.0
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > >
> > > > > The tag to be voted on is 1.1.0RC0:
> > > > >
> > > > >   https://github.com/apache/phoenix-thirdparty/tree/1.1.0RC0
> > > > >
> > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, as well as
> > CHANGES.md
> > > > > and RELEASENOTES.md included in this RC can be found at:
> > > > >
> > > > >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/1.1.0RC0/
> > > > >
> > > > > Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository at:
> > > > >
> > > > >   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories//
> > > > >
> > > > > Artifacts were signed with the 0x794433C7 key which can be found
> in:
> > > > >
> > > > >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/phoenix/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > To learn more about Apache phoenix thirdparty, please see
> > > > >
> > > > >   http://phoenix.apache.org/
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Istvan
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chinmay Kulkarni
> >
>

Reply via email to