+1 to dropping support for 2.1 and 2.2.

Because of some incompatible 2.0-era changes to coprocessor interfaces, and
a bug around raw filters, we weren't able to support the newer global
indexes at all on 2.1, and even on 2.2 we have an issue where we can't
protect index consistency during major compaction. Getting rid of 2.1 and
2.2 support would let us simplify a lot.

Geoffrey

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 6:28 AM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote:

> We can also consider dropping support for 2.4.0.
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 12:21 PM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Both Hbase 2.1 and 2.2 have been EOL for a little more than a year.
> >
> > Do we want to keep supporting them in HBase 5.2 ?
> >
> > Keeping them is not a big burden, as the compatibility modules are ready,
> > but we could simplify the compatibility module interface a bit, and free
> up
> > resources in the multibranch test builds.
> >
> > WDYT ?
> >
> > Istvan
> >
>

Reply via email to