[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacob Isaac reassigned PHOENIX-6978:
------------------------------------
Assignee: Jacob Isaac (was: Lokesh Khurana)
> Redesign Phoenix TTL for Views
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6978
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6978
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jacob Isaac
> Assignee: Jacob Isaac
> Priority: Major
>
> With Phoenix TTL for views (PHOENIX-3725), the basic gist was the TTL should
> be a Phoenix view level setting instead of being at the table level as
> implemented in HBase. More details on the old design are here ([Phoenix TTL
> old design
> doc|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aZWhJQCARBVt9VIXNgINCB8O0fk2GucxXeu7472SVL8/edit#heading=h.kpf13qig3vdl]).
> Both HBase TTL and Phoenix TTL rely on applying expiration logic during the
> scanning phase when serving query results and apply deletion logic when
> pruning the rows from the store. In HBase, the pruning is achieved during the
> compaction phase.
> The initial design and implementation of Phoenix TTL for views used the MR
> framework to run delete jobs to prune away the expired rows. We knew this was
> a sub-optimal solution since it required managing and monitoring MR jobs. It
> would also have introduced additional delete markers which would have
> temporarily added more rows (delete markers) have made the scans less
> performant.
> Using the HBase compaction framework instead to prune away the expired rows
> would fit nicely into the existing architecture and would be efficient like
> pruning the HBase TTL rows.
> This jira proposes a redesign of Phoenix TTL for Views using PHOENIX-6888 and
> PHOENIX-4555
> [New Design
> doc|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D2B0G_sVe9eE66bk-sxUfSgoGtQCvD7xBZRxZz-Q1TM/edit]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
